revolutionary tools.  groundbreaking articles.  proven results.

How Does Chris Gragg Compare to Wide Receivers?

6_474224

One of the comments on the Chris Gragg post asked how he would stack up against the wide receivers in this class, which is a great question considering that I advocated just playing him at receiver.

Here is a table which shows the top wide receivers in this class based on the physical score that goes into my WR model, along with Gragg’s name added to the list.  You can see that Gragg is at the top of the list.

NAME POS HT WT 40 Time VL Physical Score
Chris Gragg TE 75 244 4.50 37.50 4.89
Mark Harrison WR 75 231 4.46 38.50 4.26
Marcus Davis WR 75 233 4.56 39.50 3.77
Cordarrelle Patterson WR 74 216 4.42 37 2.76
Da’Rick Rogers WR 74 217 4.52 39.50 2.57
Ryan Swope WR 72 205 4.34 37 2.44
Chris Harper WR 73 229 4.55 35.50 2.40
Rodney Smith WR 76 225 4.51 34.50 2.12
Josh Boyce WR 71 206 4.38 34 1.35
Justin Hunter WR 76 196 4.44 39.50 1.26
Deandre Hopkins WR 73 214 4.57 36 0.86
Denard Robinson WR 70 199 4.43 36.50 0.85
Aaron Mellette WR 74 217 4.54 33.50 0.78
Tyrone Goard WR 79 205 4.50 36 0.64
Lanear Sampson WR 71 204 4.46 33.50 0.26
Ryan Spadola WR 73 204 4.48 33.50 0.07
Kenny Stills WR 72 194 4.38 33.50 0.03
Corey Fuller WR 74 204 4.43 31.50 0.01

If you want to think about Gragg’s mix of size and athleticism in a very simple way, you could say that he’s about as fast as the average wide receiver and he’s about 40 pounds heavier.

To compare Gragg to the receivers on production measures is probably a little more difficult as he only played in four games.  But in those four games he compiled 27% of Arkansas’ passing yardage and 42% of their touchdowns.  Those numbers compare favorably with tight ends or wide receivers.  Deandre Hopkins, who is the most accomplished WR in this class recorded 34% of Clemson’s passing yards and 46% of their touchdowns.  So Gragg isn’t that far off of that pace and he’s going to be available to a team for free essentially.  Could you expect Gragg to be immediately productive as a WR/TE combo?  I’m not sure, but I do think he could probably help right away in the red zone.  Consider that over the past dozen years, tight ends have a red zone TD rate of 28%, while wide receivers as a group have a red zone TD rate of 22%.  Points win football games and touchdowns have 2X the point value of a field goal, so teams should be optimizing their strategies to score touchdowns.  It’s pretty crazy how much this issue is overlooked by both teams and the football media.  I realize that drives don’t start in the red zone, but it’s a logical leap to claim that players that can get open and catch passes in the shortest part of the field, somehow couldn’t do it between the 20s.

Find An article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages

recent and related...

in case you missed it...

Contract Year RBs: Fantasy Appeal of the Walk Year Stars

  We’re back again to offer our thoughts on prominent contract year players at one of the fantasy footballs most important positions, namely running back. Yes, I know the popular theory is that they don’t matter. But getting a good one can be the reason you take home a fantasy

Read More

3 Deep Sleepers RotoViz Likes More Than You

  Being player agnostic is one of the best edges you can find in fantasy football in 2019 — don’t fall in love with a player, fall in love with his price. With the suite of RotoViz tools, finding this year’s most mispriced players is easier than ever, so let’s

Read More

When The Devy Breaks: Mock Draft Breakdown

  Last week I took part in a devy mock draft hosted by Greg Brandt from over at Devy Watch. It was a 12-team, PPR scoring, non-Superflex draft with a player pool consisting of 2020, 2021, and 2022 eligible prospects. Two of my fellow RotoViz writers, Travis May and Matt

Read More
Connect
Support

rotovizmain@gmail.com

Sign-up today for our free Premium Email subscription!

© 2019 RotoViz. All rights Reserved.