revolutionary tools.  groundbreaking articles.  proven results.

Using an Age Adjustment to Value Second Year Wide Receivers

Recently I wrote about work I’m doing to try to get closer to having an accurate way to age-adjust players once they’re in the NFL. This work is very much ongoing, and not definitive by any measure. However, I still like to write about it even if it’s a work in progress because the act of writing about it helps me to clarify further questions I want to ask. One of the things I’m starting to see is that it’s early in the player’s career where the age adjustments have the most utility, then things sort of plateau for a few years, and then age adjustments become more important later in their career.

Since there are various moving parts at play, like production, age, experience, and draft position – some of which might not be linear in the way they relate to projecting fantasy points – I thought it might be interesting to simply use a regression isolated on rookie receivers to determine which variables have been significant in the past at explaining year two PPR scoring. After looking at a number of combinations of variables (mostly focused on interchanging the production variables), this is the best fit I found for the rookies who played in the 2000-2014 time period.


DEXP (draft expectation) is a transformed version of draft position to account for draft position having a nonlinear effect on fantasy scoring. DEXP in this case is also specific to players who have already played their rookie season but no other seasons. YDS is the player’s receiving yards per game, while GMS is the total games played in the rookie season, and AGE just takes the season and subtracts out the player’s date of birth. Note that while in a regression you would ideally want a variable that is more accurately observed than that, this saves me having to do a lot of research on actual dates of birth rather than simply using year of birth.1

I still need to redo this process in a way that will let me validate the model against a testing set, but for now I just wanted to offer a look into how these variables would impact valuation by showing the year two fantasy points that would be predicted for the 2015 rookie class. Again, just to be clear, this isn’t an actual prediction because I haven’t validated this model against a test set.

Amari Cooper 21 13.70 16 67.63 4 11.44 14.61
DeVante Parker 22 11.68 8 61.75 14 10.24 11.21
Stefon Diggs 22 11.62 13 55.38 146 4.14 10.19
Devin Funchess 21 6.77 16 29.56 41 7.76 9.72
Dorial Green-Beckham 22 7.92 14 39.21 40 7.83 9.68
Tyler Lockett 23 9.90 16 41.50 69 6.35 9.41
Jamison Crowder 22 8.34 16 37.75 105 5.33 9.37
Nelson Agholor 22 4.38 13 21.46 20 9.59 8.03
Phillip Dorsett 22 4.50 11 20.45 29 8.72 7.24
Jaelen Strong 21 4.81 10 16.10 70 6.32 6.54
J.J. Nelson 23 5.99 9 33.22 159 3.84 6.27
Ty Montgomery 22 8.72 5 27.20 94 5.70 5.76
Chris Conley 23 4.77 9 22.11 76 6.11 5.68
Devin Smith 23 3.79 7 16.43 37 8.06 5.11
Justin Hardy 24 4.49 9 21.56 107 5.27 4.81
Keith Mumphery 23 3.36 8 16.13 175 3.51 4.17
Rashad Greene 23 4.48 9 10.33 139 4.32 4.00
Sammie Coates 22 2.10 1 11.00 87 5.89 3.18
Geremy Davis 23 1.37 3 7.00 186 3.32 1.99
Darren Waller 23 1.27 3 6.00 204 3.13 1.84
Mario Alford 24 2.50 1 15.00 238 3.32 1.75
Tre McBride 23 4.90 2 4.00 245 3.43 1.47
Vince Mayle 24 1 123 4.76 0.55

There is one major takeaway I have after this exercise: even when you control for draft position and rookie production, age has still been a significant variable for the historical data. But the other takeaway I have just from looking at this table is that you can see what a big impact opportunity is going to have on generating the independent variables in the model. If Rishard Matthews doesn’t get injured, then the production numbers helping Devante Parker are going to look a lot worse. Doing our own offensive projections in a few months (after rookies and free agents are a known commodity) will still be very important to arriving at a good estimate for 2016 production. Usage is that conditional probability that looms large between any understanding we might have of age — or draft position — and actual fantasy scoring, which is all we care about.

I’ll be continuing this work in the coming weeks because there’s still a lot of wood to chop. For instance, the way that the transformed draft variable is constructed can impact the results and that’s an interesting thing to look at. In addition, I don’t show weight in this model but it was pretty close to being significant. If you remember that I say a more closely observed Age variable would be more ideal, the same thing applies to weight. How many times during a player’s career do we get a good and accurate weight measurement? Not many, and yet lots of players add and lose weight over their careers. So that’s a variable where it’s already pretty close to being significant while not closely observed at all. If I was a betting man I would say that getting a more closely observed number is more likely to end up being more significant in the model rather than less significant.

  1. which is already in my dataset  (back)

recent and related...

in case you missed it...

Week 17 Quarterback Streaming and DFS Options

Though we recapped last week, I could not in good conscience leave those hanging who either use this article for DFS or are in a league that plays throughout the entirety of the regular season. If it’s the latter, you should probably consider not participating in such a league moving

Read More

Best Ball Win Rates: 2019 Awards

Shawn Siegele uses the Best Ball Win Rates tool to hand out awards to the top performances in six categories.  Each week I’ve been using our Best Ball tools to evaluate a different fantasy position. We’ve already begun grading the Best Ball Workshop, a series of how-to strategy articles built on

Read More

16 Stats to Know for DFS in Week 17

Utilizing RotoViz’s suite of creative tools, metrics, and filterable stats (all of which just keep getting better!), I unearthed 16 key stats to help you crush your Week 17 NFL DFS lineups. Vegas lines for Week 17 Reported lines are current as of December 26, 2019.1 CLE @ CIN: The

Read More

Sign-up today for our free Premium Email subscription!

© 2019 RotoViz. All rights Reserved.