Which 2016 RB Prospects are the most accomplished Receivers?

He’s got soft hands. 

He’s a three-down back.

He’s a natural pass catcher.

He’s a third-down back.

WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN, BASIL?!

One of the big questions that comes up every year with running back prospects is how good are they at catching passes. Oddly, for as many pass-catching metrics as I have at my disposal, I rarely ever bother to deploy them toward the running back position, instead choosing to focus on wide receivers. Nevermore!

With the list of combine invitees now public, I dove deep into this year’s crop to see who are the most accomplished pass-catching running backs. As a reminder, combine invitations are a secret weapon to finding undervalued running back prospects and should probably be the focus of our prospect evaluation efforts.

Before we get into this year’s class, I want to call upon some of the NFL’s most productive pass-catching backs from the 2015 season to establish some baselines. These figures represent their college performance.

RBF Rec/GF RecYd/GCareer Run/RecF MSrecYDS
Gio Bernard4.749.04.616.8%
Duke Johnson2.932.47.613.0%
Theo Riddick2.828.52.012.8%
Charles Sims3.833.42.912.8%
James White3.023.18.811.7%
Shane Vereen1.817.47.510.0%
Devonta Freeman1.619.98.67.2%

In general, the NFL’s best pass catchers accumulated more than 1.5 receptions and 15 receiving yards per game in their final college season. They also tended to accumulate at least 10 percent of their team’s receiving yards in their last year. Career runs-per-reception is basically an indicator of usage; the better pass catchers caught about one pass for every nine collegiate carries.

Market Share Performance

To start off, let’s look at this year’s running backs based on their market share of team receiving yards. These numbers are based on their final college season.

RBSchoolHtWtMS RecYds
Dan Vitale (H-Back) Northwestern7423521.2%
Devontae Booker Utah7121215.5%
Kenneth Dixon Louisiana Tech7021313.2%
Josh Ferguson Illinois7019612.8%
Tyler Ervin San Jose State7019211.6%
C.J. Prosise Notre Dame7322011.3%
Kenyan Drake Alabama732109.1%
Ezekiel Elliott Ohio State722258.4%
DeAndre Washington Texas Tech682007.6%
Brandon Wilds South Carolina742207.4%
Paul Perkins UCLA712106.5%
Marshaun Coprich Illinois State692056.0%
Tra Carson Texas A&M722355.5%
Kelvin Taylor Florida702055.2%
Tre Madden USC732255.1%
Peyton Barber Auburn712255.0%
Wendell Smallwood West Virginia712014.9%
Devon Johnson Marshall732444.8%
Glenn Gronkowski (FB) Kansas State752344.7%
Jordan Howard Indiana732304.3%
Quayvon Hicks (FB) Georgia742513.1%
Alex Collins Arkansas712152.7%
Derrick Henry Alabama752422.7%
Jonathan Williams '14 Arkansas712192.7%
Andy Janovich (FB) Nebraska732302.0%
Keith Marshall Georgia712121.3%
Daniel Lasco Cal732051.0%
Shad Thornton NC State732180.0%
Soma Vainuku (FB) USC722550.0%

While Ezekiel Elliott and Derrick Henry get most of the attention in this year’s class, a couple of “second tier” backs show very well here and appear to have the skills to be every-down contributors. Weighing at least 210 pounds and carrying high praise from the scouting community, Devontae Booker, Kenneth Dixon, C.J. Prosise and Kenyan Drake all shouldered a hefty portion of their team’s passing attack. Elliott is a fraction behind the leaders, but is definitely above average for this class.

Tyler Ervin and Josh Ferguson are on the smaller side, but absolutely hold their own as receivers and could be intriguing role-players a la Darren Sproles or Shane Vereen.

Profiling more like two-down bruisers, Derrick Henry, Alex Collins and the forgotten Jonathan Williams all rank among the least involved pass-catchers in this class.

Per-Game Performance

Let’s switch gears and look at the per-game receiving performance of this year’s class in their final college season.

RBSchoolRec/GRecYd/G
Kenneth Dixon Louisiana Tech1.115.3
Marshaun Coprich Illinois State1.413.8
Tyler Ervin San Jose State1.813.2
DeAndre Washington Texas Tech1.312.7
Dan Vitale (H-Back) Northwestern1.111.8
Devontae Booker Utah1.310.8
C.J. Prosise Notre Dame0.910.6
Kenyan Drake Alabama1.010.0
Josh Ferguson Illinois1.39.8
Paul Perkins UCLA1.08.3
Ezekiel Elliott Ohio State0.96.8
Tra Carson Texas A&M0.95.7
Wendell Smallwood West Virginia0.95.7
Kelvin Taylor Florida0.65.1
Brandon Wilds South Carolina0.65.0
Jonathan Williams '14 Arkansas0.85.0
Tre Madden USC0.64.5
Peyton Barber Auburn0.43.6
Jordan Howard Indiana0.43.5
Alex Collins Arkansas0.43.2
Derrick Henry Alabama0.43.0
Glenn Gronkowski (FB) Kansas State0.22.6
Devon Johnson Marshall0.22.0
Andy Janovich (FB) Nebraska0.11.9
Quayvon Hicks (FB) Georgia0.11.1
Keith Marshall Georgia0.10.9
Daniel Lasco Cal0.10.9
Shad Thornton NC State00
Soma Vainuku (FB) USC00

Most of the same names as last time – Dixon, Ervin, Booker, Prosise – fare well here too, but a few new names join the fray. In high powered offenses, Texas Tech’s DeAndre Washington and Illinois State’s Marshaun Coprich came up with solid counting stats in their final season. Paul Perkins continues to be solid too.

Near the bottom, the trio of Henry, Collins and Williams continues to underwhelm, and I’m going to put Jordan Howard in that category too.

To be honest, I don’t have a good answer as to whether market share or counting stats matter more, so I’m including both. At the very least, I don’t think that more reps (better counting stats even in the presence of lower market share) could hurt a guy’s case.

Career Performance

Since usage can change throughout a player’s career, I took one last look at the players’ complete résumé. The following table contains career counting stats and one key ratio that I’m going to focus on: carries/reception. For their careers, guys that have a lower ratio will have more balanced usage patters and probably have more potential to be every-down backs. Guys with higher ratios are more likely early-down thumpers who will come off the field in passing situations. Obviously there are some fullbacks and lesser-used runners in here, but you get the idea. Remember: the collegiate usage pattern established at the beginning of the article by the NFL’s best receivers was nine, or fewer, carries per reception.

RBSchoolRuAttRuYdsRuYds/GRecRecYdsRecYds/GCarries/Rec
Dan Vitale (FB)NW6290.6135142729.70.04
Glenn Gronkowski (FB)K St16512.21536916.01.1
Soma Vainuku (FB)USC241483.5171243.01.4
Quayvon Hicks (FB)UGA231668.3121326.61.9
C.J. ProsiseND167115536.16289628.02.7
Josh FergusonILL505258655.0168150732.13.0
DeAndre WashingtonTT605341169.6124109122.34.9
Kenyan DrakeBama233149536.54657013.95.1
Tyler ErvinSJSU528280359.68778316.76.1
Wendell SmallwoodWVU425246264.86861816.36.3
Brandon WildsS Car379184445.05954013.26.4
Tre MaddenUSC223115557.83233416.77.0
Devontae BookerUtah5602773120.68062227.07.0
Daniel LascoCal348187245.74845811.27.3
Paul PerkinsUCLA621348889.48073918.97.8
Shad ThorntonNC St513257271.46150414.08.4
Andy Janovich (FB)Neb4527110.85873.59.0
Kenneth DixonLa Tech802448395.48796920.69.2
Ezekiel ElliottOSU5923961113.25844912.810.2
Keith MarshallUGA253137941.8242256.810.5
Tra CarsonTx A&M473232950.6423056.611.3
Devon JohnsonMarsh305237355.2274239.811.3
Jonathan WilliamsArk406232164.5263459.615.6
Kelvin TaylorFla486210860.2241795.120.3
Peyton BarberAub247107059.4111126.222.5
Alex CollinsArk665370397.4271674.424.6
Jordan HowardIU6473681115.0242618.227.0
Marshaun CoprichILL St927519699.9332334.528.1
Derrick HenryBama602359192.1172857.335.4

In summary, I would say that C.J. Prosise, Devontae Booker, Paul Perkins (who I’m a fan of) and Kenneth Dixon all have proven themselves as receivers and could very well be every-down backs in the NFL. Meanwhile, guys like Josh Ferguson, Tyler Ervin and DeAndre Washington profile as potentially intriguing niche players.

I am somewhat concerned about Derrick Henry, Alex Collins and Jordan Howard, from the point of view that they may be forced to come off the field on passing downs. However, their physical style lends itself to plenty of goal line opportunities, which probably offsets their receiving limitations.

Ultimately, this is tricky because actual skill and college usage/production are not necessarily aligned. However, I tend to prefer demonstrated production over hypothetical ability, so, for now, I’m comfortable with this as an exploratory exercise.


Jon Moore is a contributor at RotoViz and a cohost of Rotoviz Radio – A Fantasy Football Podcast. Continue this conversation with him on Google+Facebook or Twitter.

What we do
Connect
Support

rotovizmain@gmail.com

Sign-up today for our free Premium Email subscription!

© 2019 RotoViz. All rights Reserved.