revolutionary tools.  groundbreaking articles.  proven results.

The 2018 RotoViz Scouting Index – Wide Receivers v.2.0

The RotoViz Scouting Index (RSI) is up and running for 2018. The RSI tracks NFL draft prospect rankings from a variety of traditional scouting sites, giving you quick insight into how incoming rookies are currently being valued over in “real football” land.

We’ll track the rise and fall of player values throughout the draft season, and assess the impact on player fantasy valuations. Thanks to the data wizardry of Dave Caban, we’ll be aggregating rankings from a half-dozen popular and well-respected sites. This is the second update for the wide receiver position; the initial index can be found here.


Make sure to read the introductory article to this series so you understand where the data comes from and how the scores are calculated.



I expect we’ll see more movement in the RSI once the component ranking services have a chance to fully digest the NFL combine results. As of now, however, there’s not been much change at the wide receiver position. The top-nine players maintained their pre-combine ranking.

There is one change in average rankings, however. Auden Tate dropped a fair bit. That’s likely due to his poor combine performance (4.68 second 40, 31-inch vertical, 112-inch broad jump).1 Let’s take a quick look at Tate’s profile to see how much this might matter.

Read Auden Tate’s Prospect Profile 


There’s no denying his athletic measurables are poor but are they a death knell for his NFL outlook? I combed NFL combine results for his most favorable comps:

YearNameHeight (in)Weight (lbs)40 YardSPDSCOREVert Leap (in)Broad Jump (in)Shuttle3ConeHand Size (in)Arm Length (in)
2018Auden Tate76.92284.6895.1311129.3833.75
2016Michael Thomas74.752124.5797.2351264.136.810.532.13
2015Devin Funchess76.252324.795.138.51229.7533.5
2014Jarvis Landry71.52054.6587.728.511010.2531.75
2014Allen Hurns73.251984.5592.4311204.57.239.2532
2012Mohamed Sanu73.52114.6292.6361264.226.8810.1333.5
2010Brandon LaFell74.52114.5895.9361154.236.81
2004Michael Clayton74.82094.6192.532.51164.096.779.1332.38
2003Anquan Boldin72.62164.7386.333.51149.8830
2000Plaxico Burress77.42314.59104.1331159.533.75
1998Joe Jurevicius76.92314.6698.031.51184.487.499.533
1996Amani Toomer74.91974.596.1401324.14932.5

To be absolutely clear, these are the best names out of dozens of names that were within five pounds of his weight or a few tenths of his forty time. So yes, his numbers are empirically bad. But as you can see, a number of players have been quite successful despite some poor measurables.

In one of my all-time favorite RotoViz articles, Kevin Cole established that, when it comes to wide receivers, production is the only thing that matters. Even excluding production numbers from his regression tree analysis led to the conclusion that

athleticism is less predictive for wide receivers generally, and that more of our wide receiver prospect analysis should be focused on production.

Let’s apply Cole’s regression tree to Tate’s collegiate career.2


wr_tree_prod_meas (2)

Working our way down the tree, we see:

  • Career market share of receiving yards (16 percent) less than 29 percent = Yes
  • Final year receiving yards (548) less than 933 = Yes

That puts Tate in the far-left bucket, where receivers have just a 2.6 percent chance of having a fantasy WR1 season in their first three years in the NFL.

It’s not all doom and gloom though. Tate captured 21 percent of his team’s receiving yards in his final season to go along with nearly 48 percent of his team’s receiving touchdowns. Combine those numbers and we get a Dominator Rating of 0.34, which is a good but not elite number. Tate is also the third-youngest WR in this year’s class which is a nice indicator. Still, at this early stage, it looks like Tate might be a player whose draft stock continues to fall.

  1. It’s always intriguing when the film crowd drops a player based on an athletic measures.  (back)
  2. 2016-2017  (back)

recent and related...

in case you missed it...

16 Stats to Know for DFS in Week 16

Utilizing RotoViz’s suite of creative tools, metrics, and filterable stats (all of which just keep getting better!), I unearthed 16 key stats to help you crush your Week 16 NFL DFS lineups. Vegas lines for Week 16 Reported lines are current as of December 19, 2019.1 LAR @ SF: This

Read More

The 3 and Out: League Wide Expected Points

The 3 and Out uses several RotoViz Apps to uncover significant workload changes; league, team, and player-specific trends; and hidden but powerful statistics. Earlier in the week, Blair Andrews explained why we care about expected points. Today, we’ll take a quick look at 2019 expected points through a league-wide lens

Read More

NFL Week 16 DraftKings Targets: Full Weekend Of Football

It’s fantasy football championship week, and we might as well carry that cash collection spirit over to the DFS side of things. We’ve got a three-game slate on Saturday with three separate island games, and this is a spot to attack. With the earliest game on Saturday likely to have

Read More

FanDuel NFL Cash Plays – Week 16

Championship Week is here. If you aren’t in your league’s big game then The Fantasy Football Ghost has some players for your Week 16 FanDuel cash games. While the last few weeks have been brutal, Week 15 saw a bit of a turnaround for us. It wasn’t quite back to

Read More

DK Buffet Week 16: Key Stats for the Main Slate on DraftKings

When I’m looking into the DFS slate each week, I like to go game by game and identify players or situations that intrigue me. In every game, on every team, there’s a situation that’s relevant for DFS, for either a positive or negative reason. These situations inform us of how

Read More

Sign-up today for our free Premium Email subscription!

© 2019 RotoViz. All rights Reserved.