Why Do We Care About Expected Points? An Explanation in 4 Correlation Matrices
Image Credit: Robin Alam/Icon Sportswire. Pictured: Lamar Jackson.

If you spend any time reading RotoViz, eventually you’ll hear us talking about expected points. Expected points (EP) are the number of fantasy points that a target or carry should score based on game situation — down, distance, and field position. In other words, expected points allow us to transform raw opportunity, such as carries and targets, directly into fantasy points. From there we can look out how players actually perform with their opportunity — how many points they actually score — and arrive at a player’s fantasy points over expectation (FPOE). FPOE turns out to be a catch-all efficiency metric that accounts for both yards and touchdowns in a single number. Add EP (opportunity) and FPOE (efficiency) together, and you get a player’s actual fantasy output.

But you might also wonder why we care so much about expected points? What do EP and FPOE tell us that simple PPR points do not? And how should we be using EP and FPOE data to inform our fantasy decisions?

To answer these questions, I dropped all the 2019 numbers we’ve been tracking in this column into a series of correlation matrices — one for each position. The vertical axis lists Week N metrics, while the horizontal axis lists Week N+1 metrics, so you can read down the list and scan across the matrix to find out how predictive your favorite metrics are from one week to the next. Things should become clear as we go through each matrix.

The Matrices

The way to read the matrix above (and all those below) is to find a metric on the vertical axis and then scan across to see how well it correlates with some other metric in the following week. So, starting at the top, we find total EP. If we look across the top row to the very end, we find that EP has a 0.235 correlation with PPR points in the following week. If we then scan down to the bottom right corner, we also find that this is slightly higher than the 0.23 correlation PPR scoring has with itself in the following week. So expected points predict future PPR points better than PPR points do.

By far the most stable — and most predictive — quarterback metric is market share of total EP. A quarterback’s share of his team’s total EP in one week is the only metric that has at least a 0.3 correlation with fantasy scoring in the following week. And because nearly every QB accounts for 100% of his team’s passing EP, this tells us something important about the QBs that score well in a given week. The two ways a QB could excel at msEP are by accounting for a large portion of his team’s rushing EP, or by his team having a large portion of their overall EP come from the passing game. For fantasy purposes, we generally only want to chase the former (with a few exceptions).

We have two great examples this season. Lamar Jackson leads all QBs in msEP — in fact the only player accounting for a higher percentage of his team’s total EP is Christian McCaffrey. After Week 15, Jackson leads all players in PPR points, edging McCaffrey by just 1.6 points.

Join now or log in to keep reading the best value in fantasy sports





Tired of Receiving the Same Advice? Ready to Take Your League by Storm?

RotoViz has you covered. Leverage our high-stakes experts, experienced writers, and killer apps to have your best season yet! RotoViz is famous for its groundbreaking content, evidenced-based approach, and pushing the fantasy industry forward.

The site's app suite boasts some of the absolute best fantasy tools in the industry and continues to grow. 

*per the RotoViz Strength of Schedule Streaming App

Powerful, Actionable, Must-Use Apps




The NFL STAT EXPLORER is arguably the most efficient, comprehensive, and interactive tool in the entire industry. How many times did Julio Jones finish as a WR1 in 2018? Is Stefon Diggs scoring more points than expected based on game situation? How difficult is Matt Ryan's upcoming schedule? Is Lamar Jackson targeting Marquise Brown deep down the field? Check out the NFL STAT EXPLORER to answer all of these questions, and more, with just a couple of clicks.





How many points will Nick Chubb score this week? 10, 15, 20? Wouldn't it be great to have an idea of what a poor, average, or strong performance would look like? Better yet, why not get a sense of how players similar to Chubb have fared when playing defenses similar to the one he will oppose? 

The RotoViz WEEKLY GLSP PROJECTIONS do just that. You select a player and the tool finds instances in which similar players faced defenses similar to his current week matchup. The tool then summarizes the results of these matchups -- generating an average stat line and fantasy point range of outcomes. Quickly export the entire set of projections, draw conclusions based on the included graphs, and compare specific players.





The RotoViz DFS LINEUP OPTIMIZER leverages the power of the WEEKLY GLSP PROJECTIONS to generate DFS lineups based upon a variety of parameters and constraints. Efficiently diversify your Yahoo!, DraftKings, and FanDuel lineups by selecting positions to stack with your QB, filling your flex with a specific position, ignoring specific players, and including others. Given your selections, the optimizer will review the GLSP projections and player salaries to find value and generate 'optimal lineups'. 



2019 App Suite Highlights











Get off the sidelines and make the most of 2019 by subscribing to RotoViz today!  


If you have questions please shoot us an email at rotovizmain@gmail.com!

Blair Andrews

Managing Editor, Author of The Wrong Read, Occasional Fantasy Football League Winner. All opinions are someone else's.
What we do


Sign-up today for our free Premium Email subscription!

© 2019 RotoViz. All rights Reserved.