revolutionary tools.  groundbreaking articles.  proven results.

Putting 2019 in Context: So How Should We Approach 2020 Best Ball Drafts?

In the first three parts of this series, we looked at running backs and wide receivers drafted in the “RB Dead Zone” — Rounds 3 through 6 — and those drafted in the double-digit rounds. Today, we’ll combine everything we’ve learned (with some help from the Fanball Roster Construction Explorer) to talk about one of the most potent strategies in fantasy football.

A Quick Refresher

On the off chance that you have not been fervently waiting for each subsequent part of this series to be posted, here’s a quick summary of the first three parts:

I recommend you go back and read each of the previous articles if you haven’t already, but I’m probably also a little bit biased.

One Strategy to Rule Them All

There is a strategy that has posted an above-expectation win rate in four of the last five seasons. It’s had a win rate of at least 10.7% in three of the last four years and an overall win rate of 11.0% over the last five years combined. It also fits with everything we’ve discussed in the first three parts of this series.

Modified Zero RB is an absolute juggernaut.

There’s no formal, industry-wide definition for what counts as modified Zero RB, but I’m going to define it as when a team picks their RB1 in the first round and their RB2 after Round 6 (the end of the “RB Dead Zone”).

RB1 in Round 1, RB2 After Round 6 (2015-19)

It’s also possible to execute this strategy by picking your RB1 in the second round, although it’s clearly less effective than when you get a bona fide stud RB with your first pick. Still, this method has had an above-expectation win rate in three of the last five seasons and sports a healthy overall win rate of 9.1%.

RB1 in Round 2, RB2 After Round 6 (2015-19)

Intuitively, modified Zero RB makes a lot of sense. We know that Rounds 3-6 are jam-packed with wide receivers, so it makes sense to hammer WR in those rounds. On a related note, a lot of the RBs that go crazy and carry their owners to victory are found in the first round; Christian McCaffrey, Todd Gurley, and David Johnson are three recent examples. Merge the league-winning upside of an early RB with the year-over-year consistency of mid-round WRs, and you’ve got a pretty lethal combination on your hands.

How Modified Zero RB Worked in 2019

Even though it was a down year for late-round RBs, modified Zero RB with an RB in Round 1 was even better than average, with a 12.6% win rate in 2019.

RB1 in Round 1, RB2 After Round 6 (2019)

It wasn’t as effective for those who waited until the second round to pick their RB1, as those teams had a win rate of just 7.5%. That discrepancy can mostly be explained by looking at the individual players who were taken in those rounds; a good number of the teams who picked their RB1 in the first round likely had McCaffrey, who posted the highest win rate ever, whereas Round 2 RBs were significantly less successful.1 Furthermore, it’s not like there weren’t any good RBs outside of the first few rounds; Austin Ekeler and Miles Sanders were both integral parts of many championship teams, and they were both picked in the late single-digit rounds (so we didn’t talk about them in Part 3 of this series, which only focused on RBs picked in Round 10 or later). That, combined with the fact that mid-round WRs had a strong year, made modified Zero RB teams a force to be reckoned with despite the historically bad year for late-round runners.

How Modified Zero RB Fits Into This Series

As we examined in Parts 1 and 2, you can expect WRs picked in Rounds 3-6 to continue to smash in 2020, and RBs selected in those rounds will likely fall short of your expectations. Furthermore, you can expect late-round RBs to rebound next year, as there was an extraordinary lack of breakout runners this year. Conversely, there will likely be fewer breakout late-round WRs in 2020, as this season was an anomaly in that regard. As such, you can capitalize on recency bias by loading up on WRs in Rounds 3-6 and RBs in the double-digit rounds in best ball drafts this offseason. Because dead-zone RBs scored so many points and had so many obvious hits (Aaron Jones, Derrick Henry, Chris Carson, the list goes on) and late-round RBs underperformed so severely, more owners will go after RBs in the wrong rounds. Meanwhile, you can hammer WRs in Rounds 3-6 and RBs late and profit off of other owners’ mistakes.

Especially if you’re picking early in the first round and have the opportunity to draft McCaffrey, Kamara, Saquon Barkley, or another three-down workhorse, modified Zero RB is a great way to gain an edge over your opponents. You never want to force a strategy, so don’t pigeonhole yourself into taking a certain position in a certain round, but I encourage you to utilize the modified Zero RB strategy this offseason if you are given the chance to begin your draft with a star RB.

Image Credit: John Byrum/Icon Sportswire. Pictured: Christian McCaffrey.

  1. Dalvin Cook was the exception, but his 12.4% win rate was nowhere near McCaffrey’s 36.3% and was itself partly explained by Cook’s being paired with McCaffrey on some teams.  (back)

recent and related...

in case you missed it...

Dynasty Fallout From the End of the Philip Rivers Era

Last week, the quarterback taken by the San Diego Chargers with the first overall selection in the 2004 NFL Draft announced his retirement. On Monday, Jay Glazer reported that the Chargers were set to move on from the QB they got when they traded the first to the New York

Read More

Dynasty Trade Targets 2020 – Running Back Edition

In Dynasty Trade Targets 2020 – Running Back Edition, Curtis Patrick gives away the names of three running backs he’s buying right now. As rookie fever sets in across the dynasty community, the offseason trade window also begins to crack open. I’m sharing three of my top dynasty trade targets

Read More
Connect
Support

rotovizmain@gmail.com

Sign-up today for our free Premium Email subscription!

© 2019 RotoViz. All rights Reserved.